I don’t plan to turn Wander Within Life into a trading blog.
But I do trade sometimes. And like many people who touch futures, I once had a “clever” idea I felt quite proud of.
It started with a simple thought:
“What if I use high leverage, but add a lot of extra margin, so I can’t be liquidated?”
That thought kept coming back when I looked at charts, especially when I imagined shorting weak projects or holding a “high conviction” long with big leverage. At some point I realised: before I risk real money, it would be better to build a small lab where I can stress-test these ideas first.
That’s how the leverage stress tools on Wander Within Life were born:
-
Short Strategy Stress Tester – for high-leverage shorts with extra margin:
Short Strategy Stress Tester -
High Conviction Long Strategy Analyzer – for big long ideas using leverage and “deep pockets”:
High Conviction Long Strategy Analyzer
This post is the story behind those lab pages—what I was trying to do, what the numbers actually showed me, and how it changed the way I think about risk.
The “Clever” Short Idea That Started It
The first idea looked neat on paper:
-
Use 20× leverage on a $50 short position
-
Add around $1,000 of extra margin to “protect” the trade
-
Aim at low-cap coins that might collapse if something goes wrong for the project
In my head, it sounded like this:
-
If the coin dumps a lot, I profit big.
-
If the coin pumps, my extra $1,000 keeps me safe.
-
With enough added margin, maybe the position becomes almost “un-liquidatable”.
On top of that, it felt smart:
-
“Everyone else gets liquidated by greed, but I’m adding safety.”
-
“I’m using high leverage in a responsible way.”
-
“If the project really goes to zero, my reward is big.”
The problem was: this was mostly feeling, not math.
So instead of jumping straight in, I turned the idea into a quiet experiment first.
Turning Leverage Into a Lab Experiment
I took that short strategy and built a small web-based stress tester that:
-
Takes in:
-
Entry price
-
Leverage
-
Initial capital
-
Extra “safety” margin
-
-
Then shows:
-
Position size
-
Total margin
-
A rough “bankruptcy price”
-
And a “Safe Pump %” – how far price can go against the short before everything is gone
-
That became the page:
👉 Short Strategy Stress Tester
The goal of the tool is simple:
Not to recommend the strategy, but to stress-test it until it either holds up… or breaks.
Later, I realised I was doing something similar with some of my long ideas too:
-
“What if I build a high-conviction long with leverage, plus big extra margin, and just hold it through everything?”
So I created a second tool with the same spirit, but for the other side:
-
The High Conviction Long Strategy Analyzer lets me plug in:
-
Entry price,
-
Leverage,
-
Initial capital,
-
Added margin,
-
And a daily funding rate.
-
-
Then it shows:
-
Total position value,
-
Total cash committed,
-
Liquidation price (often near zero for these setups),
-
And how much funding could quietly drain the position over time.
-
That became:
👉 High Conviction Long Strategy Analyzer
Both tools share the same purpose: strip away the story in my head and let the numbers speak.
What the Numbers Quietly Told Me
Let’s stay with the short example first, because it already reveals a lot.
1. My “20×” was actually not 20×
In the short setup, I was imagining:
-
$50 as the main trade margin, and
-
Another $1,000 as extra safety margin.
That gives:
-
Position size around $1,000
-
Total margin around $1,050
So my real leverage was:
-
Position ($1,000) ÷ Margin ($1,050) ≈ 0.95×
The exchange might proudly show “20×”, but once I throw all that extra margin at it, I’m basically trading under 1×.
In other words:
I was using the danger of futures… to do what spot already does.
I was taking on futures risks (funding fees, platform risk, liquidations, sudden wicks) for something that behaves almost like a normal spot position—but with more ways to go wrong.
The lab made that very clear.
2. Low-cap coins don’t respect my “Safe Pump %”
For low-cap coins, a +100% pump is not unusual.
Sometimes they go +200%, +300%, or more in one violent move.
When I put realistic numbers into the Short Strategy Stress Tester, I could see:
-
For some setups, the Safe Pump % was actually quite small.
-
For others, it looked large on paper—but still not impossible for a low-cap to reach in a short squeeze.
The tool helped me see a simple truth:
Low caps don’t care about my safe zone.
If liquidity is thin and shorts are crowded, the price can blow through my “safety” in one candle.
So instead of truly protecting me, that extra margin was often giving emotional comfort, not real safety.
3. For longs, “invincible” still has a price
On the long side, the High Conviction Long Strategy Analyzer did something similar.
With enough added margin, the liquidation price can move all the way down to near zero. On paper, the position becomes “mathematically impossible to liquidate” by normal price movement, because a long can only lose 100%.
But the tool quietly reminds me:
-
Even if price never hits liquidation,
-
Funding fees can keep charging every day,
-
Especially in a bull market,
-
Until they eat a painful chunk of my margin.
It also compares it with spot:
-
On spot, I can buy the same amount of the coin,
-
With no daily funding,
-
And no forced liquidation level.
So again, I’m using futures to do something spot already does, but with extra invisible costs.
4. Locking four figures to “maybe” earn four figures isn’t always attractive
On both sides, a pattern shows up:
-
If the trade goes perfectly (coin crashes for the short, or moons for the long),
-
The maximum profit is often similar to the total cash locked behind the position.
In many configurations, that makes the risk–reward look like:
-
Risk: almost everything I put in, over time.
-
Reward: about the same amount back, if everything goes exactly right.
For something that depends on specific projects collapsing or exploding in price, waiting patiently, and surviving every pump or dump along the way… that stopped feeling attractive.
And that’s before we consider:
-
Slippage,
-
Exchange outages,
-
Extreme candles that skip through levels.
The lab pages don’t show every real-world mess, but they already show enough to make me pause.
What These Labs Taught Me About Leverage
These stress tools didn’t make me hate trading.
But they did quietly change how I see leverage.
1. “I can’t be liquidated” is a warning sign
Whenever I catch myself thinking:
“This position is basically un-liquidatable.”
…that’s now a red flag.
Usually, what I really mean is:
-
“I have thrown a lot of margin at this.”
-
“I don’t want to admit the risk.”
-
“I’m emotionally attached to the idea.”
The labs reminded me that:
-
More margin ≠ no risk.
-
It only changes how the pain shows up:
-
Not in instant liquidation,
-
But in slow bleed (funding + time),
-
Or in one big event where a large chunk disappears at once.
-
2. If I need a complicated tool just to feel okay, maybe the trade isn’t worth it
To justify some of these strategies, I needed:
-
A dedicated tester,
-
Assumptions about volatility and funding,
-
And a long explanation about why it might be “safe enough”.
When a trade idea demands that much effort just to calm my nerves, maybe it’s not a trade I should build my future on.
Now, if an idea only feels acceptable after I’ve built a careful justification for it, I treat that as a signal to slow down, not speed up.
3. The tools are useful—but not as green lights
At first, I imagined these testers as ways to “prove” that I could survive big moves with clever margin tricks.
They ended up doing the opposite:
-
They showed how far the market can move against me, especially on volatile coins.
-
They reminded me that simple spot or low effective leverage with a clear stop-loss is often more honest:
-
I know exactly how much I can lose,
-
I don’t need to hide risk behind a wall of extra margin,
-
I don’t need a coin to go to zero or to the moon for a trade to make sense.
-
Now, I see these stress pages as:
Quiet mirrors, not confirmations.
If you’re curious, you can play with them here:
Where I Stand Now with Futures and Leverage
I still find markets interesting, and I still watch price action.
But this little leverage lab on Wander Within Life left me with a few personal guidelines:
-
If I use futures at all, I prefer low effective leverage, not just big numbers in the settings.
-
I focus more on position size and clear exits than on complicated margin setups.
-
I don’t want my financial peace to depend on ideas that only look safe after a long explanation.
Most of all:
My peace of mind is worth more than the potential profit from one “perfect” short or long.
I’m glad I turned these ideas into a lab instead of going all in straight away.
Not because they proved the strategies were great, but because they helped me admit that they weren’t as attractive as I first believed.
A Gentle Reminder Before You Trade
This post is not a recommendation to trade, short, or use leverage.
The leverage stress tools on Wander Within Life are simply:
-
Ways to see how fragile some setups are,
-
Ways to notice how big moves can stress a position,
-
And gentle reminders that “I’ll be fine” is not risk management.
If you do trade:
-
Please use money you can truly afford to lose,
-
Don’t put essential savings on the line,
-
And let these tools be quiet mirrors, not excuses.
For me, this small lab section on Wander Within Life is less about chasing gains, and more about mindset:
-
How easy it is to convince ourselves we’re safe,
-
And how helpful it is to stop, run the numbers, and calmly ask:
“Is this really worth it?”
No comments:
Post a Comment